Is Video Analyzer safe and trustworthy?

tashan scores Video Analyzer on public evidence — tashan score 61.0/100, it is currently active, note: a single primary maintainer (bus-factor risk), no known advisories against the current release, its declared dependencies reach: browser. Audit scope: OSV advisories, install-time scripts, build provenance and declared permission surface. We do not review source code or execute the capability.

How do I install Video Analyzer?

In Claude Code: run `claude mcp add video-analyzer -- npx -y mcp-video-analyzer`. In Cursor / Claude Desktop, add it to mcp.json / claude_desktop_config.json.

Who maintains Video Analyzer?

source: guimatheus92/mcp-video-analyzer.

‹ The Index

Video Analyzer

npm

MCP server for video analysis — extracts transcripts, key frames, OCR text, and metadata from video URLs and local files. Supports Loom, YouTube and other yt-dlp platforms, direct video URLs, and local video files.

Works with: Claude Code, Cursor, Claude Desktop, Codex CLI, Gemini CLI, Cline, Windsurf, VS Code (installable)
installable: each client documents how to load an MCP server of this type — that is the client's promise, not a claim verified against this capability

Work: Video editing

Who it is for: Creator / video

Install (Claude Code):

claude mcp add video-analyzer -- npx -y mcp-video-analyzer

solid

“14 worked examples; short of deep on per-tool docs; read with 1 linked doc(s)”

This grade is wrong ›

tashan score: 61.0
Instruction depth: 68.0 (solid — documents the job properly, with examples you could follow)
Adoption: 570/wk
Upkeep: 66.0
Freshness: 91.0
Evidence coverage: 100% of the inputs this score can use
Health: active
License: MIT

Security audit

Every finding is shown in full — which advisory, the version that fixes it, and the exact command run at install time. Nothing in this audit is behind a licence.

No known advisoriesclearchecked against OSV for 0.10.1 — this package, not its dependency tree

Drives a browserfrom declared dependencies

Can carry remote content into your agentit can pull third-party text into the model's context — treat what it returns as untrusted input

No build provenanceno attestation — the published artifact cannot be traced to its source

What changed recently

2026-08-24 the tashan score for mcp-video-analyzer rose to 69.0, from 64.0 Upkeep, freshness or adoption moved enough to change how this measures.
2026-08-27 mcp-video-analyzer published 0.10.0, was 0.9.0 A new release is available.
2026-09-13 the tashan score for mcp-video-analyzer fell to 61.0, from 68.0 Upkeep, freshness or adoption moved enough to change how this measures.

You are reading this because you came looking. tashan Pro gives tashan doctor the history behind it, so a run over your own config says which of YOURS moved.

You searched for one. Check the rest of your stack:

npx tashan-cli doctor

Reads the config already on your machine and names what is dead, deprecated or running code at install time. No account, nothing uploaded.

tashan Pro$6/mo

We recorded 4 changes to Video Analyzer in the last 45 days. Pro tells you on the day — for the servers in your own config, not the ones you thought to look up.

The whole series behind any row, back to the first day we measured it
The replacement, named — not just the news that something died
tashan doctor over your own config, on your own machine

Start a 7-day trial › Everything measured on this page stays free.

Show your score

Measured this well? Put the live badge in your README — it updates as the score does.

[![tashan](https://tashan.sh/badge/pkg-mcp-video-analyzer.svg)](https://tashan.sh/capability/pkg-mcp-video-analyzer.html)

npm ↗ · source ↗ · pkg:mcp-video-analyzer

Already running this? Check your whole config — free, in your browser, nothing installed. Or npx tashan-cli doctor locally, which sends nothing at all.

Measured 2026-09-13 · scorer s5 · how · something wrong here?