Is Work safe and trustworthy?

tashan scores Work on public evidence — tashan score 47.0/100, it is currently active. Audit scope: OSV advisories, install-time scripts, build provenance and declared permission surface. We do not review source code or execute the capability.

How do I install Work?

Drop the skill folder into ~/.claude/skills/ (user scope) or .claude/skills/ (project scope).

2 GitHub contributors, source: DiologIR/diolog-plugins.

‹ The Index

Work

skill

Author’s activation text, quoted as published

- Implement a planned feature spec end-to-end in an isolated git worktree using dynamic ultracode workflows, for the markdown feature-spec pipeline. Reads the plan (docs/plans/plan-DIO-0001.md) and spec (docs/specs/spec-DIO-0001.md), then runs understand and specify, implement (file-disjoint fan-out plus typecheck gates), rebase onto the repo's detected integration branch resolving conflicts, acceptance-review the code against the original feature description plus the triage assumptions/answers, and resolve every finding. Commits locally, appends a progress section to the spec, and sets status to In Review; no push, no remote PR — the branch stays local for human review. …

Works with: Claude Code (native) · Cursor, Codex CLI (manual)
native: this artifact type is that client's own format

Category: Dev Tools & CI — see all ranked ›

Install (Claude Code):

cp -r work ~/.claude/skills/

tashan score: 47.0
Adoption: 2 repos
Upkeep: 82.0
Freshness: 99.0
Evidence coverage: 84% of the inputs this score can use — the rest are unknown, and the score is discounted for it
Health: active
Contributors: 2
License: MIT

Security audit

Not scanned yet. We audit npm-published capabilities for known advisories, install-time scripts and permission surface; this one has no npm package we can resolve, or has not reached the queue.

Its own instructions

Its SKILL.md says when to use it, shows worked examples, covers setup and states a limitation.

Read from the capability’s own SKILL.md. This is not a grade and does not compare to the instruction-depth verdict on an MCP server — a skill has no tools to document, so that rubric does not apply to it.

You searched for one. Check the rest of your stack:

npx tashan-cli doctor

Reads the config already on your machine and names what is dead, deprecated or running code at install time. No account, nothing uploaded.

tashan Pro$6/mo

Work scores 47 today. Pro keeps the series, so you can see whether that is a project getting better or one on its way down.

Every score since we started measuring, for any capability
The named replacement when something you run is dying — not just that it is
tashan doctor over the config you already have, on your machine

Start a 7-day trial › Everything measured on this page stays free.

Show your score

Measured this well? Put the live badge in your README — it updates as the score does.

[![tashan](https://tashan.sh/badge/skill-diologir-work.svg)](https://tashan.sh/capability/skill-diologir-work.html)

source ↗ · skill:DiologIR/work

Everything on this page is public evidence and free. What it cannot know is whether you run this — check your whole config, free, in the browser. tashan Pro adds the series behind each row and names a replacement for anything dying.

Already running this? Check your whole config — free, in your browser, nothing installed. Or npx tashan-cli doctor locally, which sends nothing at all.

Measured 2026-08-20 · scorer s5 · how · something wrong here?