‹ The Index

Plan Review

skill

This skill should be used when having multiple specialized agents review a plan in parallel. It spawns DHH, Kieran, and code simplicity reviewers to provide diverse feedback on implementation plans.

Works with: Claude Code (native)  ·  Cursor, Codex CLI (manual)
native: this artifact type is that client's own format

Install (Claude Code):

cp -r plan-review ~/.claude/skills/

Security audit

Not scanned yet. We audit npm-published capabilities for known advisories, install-time scripts and permission surface; this one has no npm package we can resolve, or has not reached the queue.

Its own instructions

Its SKILL.md states a limitation.

Read from the capability’s own SKILL.md. This is not a grade and does not compare to the instruction-depth verdict on an MCP server — a skill has no tools to document, so that rubric does not apply to it.

You searched for one. Check the rest of your stack:

npx tashan-cli doctor

Reads the config already on your machine and names what is dead, deprecated or running code at install time. No account, nothing uploaded.

tashan Pro$6/mo

Plan Review scores 49 today. Pro keeps the series, so you can see whether that is a project getting better or one on its way down — and tells you the day it moves.

Start a 7-day trial › Everything measured on this page stays free.

Show your score

Measured this well? Put the live badge in your README — it updates as the score does.

tashan badge for Plan Review
[![tashan](https://tashan.sh/badge/skill-jikig-ai-plan-review.svg)](https://tashan.sh/capability/skill-jikig-ai-plan-review.html)

source ↗  ·  skill:jikig-ai/plan-review

Everything on this page is public evidence and free. What it cannot know is whether you run this — npx tashan-cli doctor reads your own config and names what is wrong in it, also free. tashan Pro tells you the day any of it changes.

Already running this? npx tashan-cli doctor checks your whole config against the Index — how it works ›

Measured 2026-08-14  ·  scorer s5  ·  how  ·  something wrong here?