Reviewer Response
| Draft a rigorous, polite, point-by-point response to reviewer comments on a journal or conference submission (R1 / R2 / R3 letters), plus the corresponding manuscript revisions. Categorizes each comment as concession / pushback / clarification needed / minor fix, drafts the response and the revision for each, and assembles a cover letter. Composes with peer-review (consume comments from a review output) and manuscript-drafter (revise prose using the manuscript's voice profile and academic register rules). Won't concede a point the data doesn't support; preserves framing where the reviewer misread; addresses every point. Trigger when: user mentions "respond to reviewers", "R1 response", "R2 response", "rebuttal", "address reviewer comments", "reviewer-response letter", "point-by-point response", "revision and resubmission", "response to reviewer 2", "cover letter to editor", or runs /respond.
Works with: Claude Code (native) · Cursor, Codex CLI (manual)
native: this artifact type is that client's own format
Category: Search — see all ranked ›
Install (Claude Code):
cp -r reviewer-response ~/.claude/skills/- Adoption: 1 repos
- Upkeep: 91.0
- Freshness: 80.0
- Evidence coverage: 84% of the inputs this score can use — the rest are unknown, and the score is discounted for it
- Health: active
- Contributors: 3
- License: MIT
Security audit
Not scanned yet. We audit npm-published capabilities for known advisories, install-time scripts and permission surface; this one has no npm package we can resolve, or has not reached the queue.
source ↗ · skill:Marazii/reviewer-response
Already running this? npx tashan-cli doctor checks your whole config against the Index — how it works ›
Measured 2026-08-05 · scorer s5 · how · something wrong here?