# Reviewer Response

> | Draft a rigorous, polite, point-by-point response to reviewer comments on a journal or conference submission (R1 / R2 / R3 letters), plus the corresponding manuscript revisions. Categorizes each comment as concession / pushback / clarification needed / minor fix, drafts the response and the revision for each, and assembles a cover letter. Composes with peer-review (consume comments from a review output) and manuscript-drafter (revise prose using the manuscript's voice profile and academic register rules). Won't concede a point the data doesn't support; preserves framing where the reviewer misread; addresses every point. Trigger when: user mentions "respond to reviewers", "R1 response", "R2 response", "rebuttal", "address reviewer comments", "reviewer-response letter", "point-by-point response", "revision and resubmission", "response to reviewer 2", "cover letter to editor", or runs /respond.

## Facts
- Page: https://tashan.sh/capability/skill-marazii-reviewer-response
- tashan id: skill:Marazii/reviewer-response
- Source: https://github.com/Marazii/research-co-pilot
- Type: skill
- Category: search
- tashan score: not scored (catalogued only — too little public evidence)
- Adoption: 9.0
- Upkeep: 91.0
- Freshness: 80.0
- Evidence coverage: 84% of the inputs this score can use
- Health: active
- Instruction depth: not yet graded
- License: MIT
- Official: no

## Install

```sh
cp -r reviewer-response ~/.claude/skills/
```

## Security audit
Not scanned. We audit npm-published capabilities; this one has no npm package we can resolve, or has not reached the queue. This is not a clean bill of health.

---
Measured 2026-08-05 by tashan (https://tashan.sh) from public evidence. Scorer s5.