Question 1

Is Agent Device or Pi MCP Adapter better?

Accepted Answer

Agent Device scores 79.0 and Pi MCP Adapter scores 79.0 on the tashan score, which measures upkeep and freshness gated by real adoption. Neither number is a security audit and neither can be bought. The gap is narrow, so compare the evidence rather than the headline.

Question 2

Are Agent Device and Pi MCP Adapter safe to install?

Accepted Answer

Agent Device: no known advisories, no build provenance. Pi MCP Adapter: no known advisories, no build provenance. Every capability tashan measures is checked against the OSV advisory database at the version you would install today, for install-time scripts and for build provenance. The audit reads public evidence and never executes anything.

Question 3

How were these two compared?

Accepted Answer

Both were measured on the same day by the same scorer, from public signal only — npm download volume and publish cadence, repository activity, maintainer count and registry status. Nobody can pay to change a score, a rank or a listing.

	Agent Device	Pi MCP Adapter	what it means
tashan score	79	79	upkeep + freshness, gated by adoption
Adoption evidence	131k/wk	111k/wk	the raw public signal the score came from
Last release	active	active	npm publish or repo push
Upkeep	72	72	cadence, maintainers, status
Expertise grade	not graded	solid	an LLM read of its own documentation against a fixed rubric
Security audit	no known advisories, no build provenance	no known advisories, no build provenance	a summary — the full audit, free, is on each dossier
Licence	MIT	—
Maintainers	one primary	one primary	bus-factor risk

Agent Device vs Pi MCP Adapter

Install either