Question 1

Is Auth0 or Mcporter better?

Accepted Answer

Mcporter scores 79.0 and Auth0 scores 75.0 on the tashan score, which measures upkeep and freshness gated by real adoption. Neither number is a security audit and neither can be bought. The gap is narrow, so compare the evidence rather than the headline.

Question 2

Are Auth0 and Mcporter safe to install?

Accepted Answer

Auth0: no known advisories. Mcporter: no known advisories, no build provenance. Every capability tashan measures is checked against the OSV advisory database at the version you would install today, for install-time scripts and for build provenance. The audit reads public evidence and never executes anything.

Question 3

How were these two compared?

Accepted Answer

Both were measured on the same day by the same scorer, from public signal only — npm download volume and publish cadence, repository activity, maintainer count and registry status. Nobody can pay to change a score, a rank or a listing.

	Auth0	Mcporter	what it means
tashan score	75	79	upkeep + freshness, gated by adoption
Adoption evidence	3k/wk	262k/wk	the raw public signal the score came from
Last release	active	active	npm publish or repo push
Upkeep	95	73	cadence, maintainers, status
Expertise grade	deep	not graded	an LLM read of its own documentation against a fixed rubric
Security audit	no known advisories	no known advisories, no build provenance	a summary — the full audit, free, is on each dossier
Licence	MIT	—
Maintainers	more than one	one primary	bus-factor risk

Auth0 vs Mcporter

Install either