AWS S3 vs Supabase
Supabase scores 72 points higher on the same evidence, which is a real separation rather than noise. Both are measured the same way, on the same day, from public evidence only — so this is a comparison of two measurements rather than two marketing pages. How we measure ›
| AWS S3 | Supabase | what it means | |
|---|---|---|---|
| tashan score | 24 | 96 | upkeep + freshness, gated by adoption |
| Adoption evidence | 1k/wk | 78k/wk | the raw public signal the score came from |
| Last release | abandoned | active | npm publish or repo push |
| Upkeep | 37 | 98 | cadence, maintainers, status |
| Expertise grade | not graded | not graded | an LLM read of its own documentation against a fixed rubric |
| Security audit | no known advisories | no known advisories | a summary — the full audit, free, is on each dossier |
| Licence | — | Apache-2.0 | |
| Maintainers | one primary | more than one | bus-factor risk |
Install either
AWS S3
claude mcp add aws-s3 -- npx -y aws-s3-mcpSupabase
claude mcp add supabase-mcp-server-supabase -- npx -y @supabase/mcp-server-supabaseNeither score is a security verdict — "well maintained" and "nothing known is wrong" are different claims, which is why the audit is a separate row and never folded into the number. The full audit for each — the advisory ids, the version that fixes them and anything that runs at install time — is free on its own page: AWS S3 · Supabase.