Question 1

Is Claude Code Session Manager or Shortcut better?

Accepted Answer

Claude Code Session Manager scores 73.0 and Shortcut scores 73.0 on the tashan score, which measures upkeep and freshness gated by real adoption. Neither number is a security audit and neither can be bought. The gap is narrow, so compare the evidence rather than the headline.

Question 2

Are Claude Code Session Manager and Shortcut safe to install?

Accepted Answer

Claude Code Session Manager: no known advisories, runs an install script, no build provenance. Shortcut: no known advisories. Every capability tashan measures is checked against the OSV advisory database at the version you would install today, for install-time scripts and for build provenance. The audit reads public evidence and never executes anything.

Question 3

How were these two compared?

Accepted Answer

Both were measured on the same day by the same scorer, from public signal only — npm download volume and publish cadence, repository activity, maintainer count and registry status. Nobody can pay to change a score, a rank or a listing.

	Claude Code Session Manager	Shortcut	what it means
tashan score	73	73	upkeep + freshness, gated by adoption
Adoption evidence	8k/wk	13k/wk	the raw public signal the score came from
Last release	active	active	npm publish or repo push
Upkeep	73	81	cadence, maintainers, status
Expertise grade	thin	thin	an LLM read of its own documentation against a fixed rubric
Security audit	no known advisories, runs an install script, no build provenance	no known advisories	a summary — the full audit, free, is on each dossier
Licence	—	MIT
Maintainers	one primary	more than one	bus-factor risk

Claude Code Session Manager vs Shortcut

Install either