Question 1

Is Git or Postman better?

Accepted Answer

Git scores 78.0 and Postman scores 77.0 on the tashan score, which measures upkeep and freshness gated by real adoption. Neither number is a security audit and neither can be bought. The gap is narrow, so compare the evidence rather than the headline.

Question 2

Are Git and Postman safe to install?

Accepted Answer

Git: no known advisories, no build provenance. Postman: no known advisories, runs an install script. Every capability tashan measures is checked against the OSV advisory database at the version you would install today, for install-time scripts and for build provenance. The audit reads public evidence and never executes anything.

Question 3

How were these two compared?

Accepted Answer

Both were measured on the same day by the same scorer, from public signal only — npm download volume and publish cadence, repository activity, maintainer count and registry status. Nobody can pay to change a score, a rank or a listing.

	Git	Postman	what it means
tashan score	78	77	upkeep + freshness, gated by adoption
Adoption evidence	4k/wk	9k/wk	the raw public signal the score came from
Last release	active	active	npm publish or repo push
Upkeep	84	86	cadence, maintainers, status
Expertise grade	solid	solid	an LLM read of its own documentation against a fixed rubric
Security audit	no known advisories, no build provenance	no known advisories, runs an install script	existence of findings is always free; the detail a licence buys is on each dossier
Licence	Apache-2.0	—
Maintainers	more than one	more than one	bus-factor risk

Git vs Postman

Install either