The Index · Productivity

T Rush vs Emailmd

Emailmd scores 4 points higher — a narrow lead. Read the evidence rows below before treating it as decisive. Both are measured the same way, on the same day, from public evidence only — so this is a comparison of two measurements rather than two marketing pages. How we measure ›

T RushEmailmdwhat it means
tashan score6872upkeep + freshness, gated by adoption
Adoption evidence2k/wk4k/wkthe raw public signal the score came from
Last releaseactiveactivenpm publish or repo push
Upkeep6872cadence, maintainers, status
Expertise gradethinsolidan LLM read of its own documentation against a fixed rubric
Security auditno known advisoriesno known advisoriesexistence of findings is always free; the detail a licence buys is on each dossier
Licence
Maintainersone primaryone primarybus-factor risk

Install either

T Rush

claude mcp add devds1989-t-rush-mcp -- npx -y @devds1989/t-rush-mcp

Emailmd

claude mcp add emailmd -- npx -y emailmd

Neither score is a security verdict — "well maintained" and "nothing known is wrong" are different claims, which is why the audit is a separate row and never folded into the number. The full audit for each, including what a licence adds, is on its own page: T Rush · Emailmd.

All ranked Productivity ›