T Rush vs Auto Mobile
Auto Mobile scores 4 points higher — a narrow lead. Read the evidence rows below before treating it as decisive. Both are measured the same way, on the same day, from public evidence only — so this is a comparison of two measurements rather than two marketing pages. How we measure ›
| T Rush | Auto Mobile | what it means | |
|---|---|---|---|
| tashan score | 68 | 72 | upkeep + freshness, gated by adoption |
| Adoption evidence | 2k/wk | 4k/wk | the raw public signal the score came from |
| Last release | active | active | npm publish or repo push |
| Upkeep | 68 | 73 | cadence, maintainers, status |
| Expertise grade | thin | thin | an LLM read of its own documentation against a fixed rubric |
| Security audit | no known advisories | no known advisories | existence of findings is always free; the detail a licence buys is on each dossier |
| Licence | — | — | |
| Maintainers | one primary | one primary | bus-factor risk |
Install either
T Rush
claude mcp add devds1989-t-rush-mcp -- npx -y @devds1989/t-rush-mcpAuto Mobile
claude mcp add kaeawc-auto-mobile -- npx -y @kaeawc/auto-mobileNeither score is a security verdict — "well maintained" and "nothing known is wrong" are different claims, which is why the audit is a separate row and never folded into the number. The full audit for each, including what a licence adds, is on its own page: T Rush · Auto Mobile.