T Rush vs Marrow
These two are level on the tashan score (within 1 points), so the score does not decide it. The evidence rows below are where they differ. Both are measured the same way, on the same day, from public evidence only — so this is a comparison of two measurements rather than two marketing pages. How we measure ›
| T Rush | Marrow | what it means | |
|---|---|---|---|
| tashan score | 68 | 69 | upkeep + freshness, gated by adoption |
| Adoption evidence | 2k/wk | 2k/wk | the raw public signal the score came from |
| Last release | active | active | npm publish or repo push |
| Upkeep | 68 | 67 | cadence, maintainers, status |
| Expertise grade | thin | not graded | an LLM read of its own documentation against a fixed rubric |
| Security audit | no known advisories | no known advisories, no build provenance | existence of findings is always free; the detail a licence buys is on each dossier |
| Licence | — | — | |
| Maintainers | one primary | one primary | bus-factor risk |
Install either
T Rush
claude mcp add devds1989-t-rush-mcp -- npx -y @devds1989/t-rush-mcpMarrow
claude mcp add marrowid-cli -- npx -y @marrowid/cliNeither score is a security verdict — "well maintained" and "nothing known is wrong" are different claims, which is why the audit is a separate row and never folded into the number. The full audit for each, including what a licence adds, is on its own page: T Rush · Marrow.