The Index · Productivity

T Rush vs Atlassian

Atlassian scores 12 points higher on the same evidence, which is a real separation rather than noise. Both are measured the same way, on the same day, from public evidence only — so this is a comparison of two measurements rather than two marketing pages. How we measure ›

T RushAtlassianwhat it means
tashan score6880upkeep + freshness, gated by adoption
Adoption evidence2k/wk4k/wkthe raw public signal the score came from
Last releaseactiveactivenpm publish or repo push
Upkeep6886cadence, maintainers, status
Expertise gradethinnot gradedan LLM read of its own documentation against a fixed rubric
Security auditno known advisoriesno known advisories, no build provenanceexistence of findings is always free; the detail a licence buys is on each dossier
LicenceMIT
Maintainersone primarymore than onebus-factor risk

Install either

T Rush

claude mcp add devds1989-t-rush-mcp -- npx -y @devds1989/t-rush-mcp

Atlassian

claude mcp add mcp-atlassian -- npx -y mcp-atlassian

Neither score is a security verdict — "well maintained" and "nothing known is wrong" are different claims, which is why the audit is a separate row and never folded into the number. The full audit for each, including what a licence adds, is on its own page: T Rush · Atlassian.

All ranked Productivity ›