Question 1

Is European Parliament or Log10x better?

Accepted Answer

Log10x scores 73.0 and European Parliament scores 69.0 on the tashan score, which measures upkeep and freshness gated by real adoption. Neither number is a security audit and neither can be bought. The gap is narrow, so compare the evidence rather than the headline.

Question 2

Are European Parliament and Log10x safe to install?

Accepted Answer

European Parliament: no known advisories. Log10x: no known advisories. Every capability tashan measures is checked against the OSV advisory database at the version you would install today, for install-time scripts and for build provenance. The audit reads public evidence and never executes anything.

Question 3

How were these two compared?

Accepted Answer

Both were measured on the same day by the same scorer, from public signal only — npm download volume and publish cadence, repository activity, maintainer count and registry status. Nobody can pay to change a score, a rank or a listing.

	European Parliament	Log10x	what it means
tashan score	69	73	upkeep + freshness, gated by adoption
Adoption evidence	2k/wk	3k/wk	the raw public signal the score came from
Last release	active	active	npm publish or repo push
Upkeep	72	85	cadence, maintainers, status
Expertise grade	deep	thin	an LLM read of its own documentation against a fixed rubric
Security audit	no known advisories	no known advisories	a summary — the full audit, free, is on each dossier
Licence	Apache-2.0	—
Maintainers	one primary	more than one	bus-factor risk

European Parliament vs Log10x

Install either