Playwright vs Trusty Squire
These two are level on the tashan score (within 2 points), so the score does not decide it. The evidence rows below are where they differ. Both are measured the same way, on the same day, from public evidence only — so this is a comparison of two measurements rather than two marketing pages. How we measure ›
| Playwright | Trusty Squire | what it means | |
|---|---|---|---|
| tashan score | 73 | 75 | upkeep + freshness, gated by adoption |
| Adoption evidence | 19k/wk | 2k/wk | the raw public signal the score came from |
| Last release | stable | active | npm publish or repo push |
| Upkeep | 83 | 99 | cadence, maintainers, status |
| Expertise grade | solid | deep | an LLM read of its own documentation against a fixed rubric |
| Security audit | no known advisories, no build provenance | no known advisories | existence of findings is always free; the detail a licence buys is on each dossier |
| Licence | MIT | MIT | |
| Maintainers | more than one | more than one | bus-factor risk |
Install either
Playwright
claude mcp add executeautomation-playwright-mcp-server -- npx -y @executeautomation/playwright-mcp-serverTrusty Squire
claude mcp add trusty-squire-mcp -- npx -y @trusty-squire/mcpNeither score is a security verdict — "well maintained" and "nothing known is wrong" are different claims, which is why the audit is a separate row and never folded into the number. The full audit for each, including what a licence adds, is on its own page: Playwright · Trusty Squire.