Question 1

Is Figma Console or Shadcn UI better?

Accepted Answer

Figma Console scores 85.0 and Shadcn UI scores 73.0 on the tashan score, which measures upkeep and freshness gated by real adoption. Neither number is a security audit and neither can be bought. The gap is wide enough to be decisive.

Question 2

Are Figma Console and Shadcn UI safe to install?

Accepted Answer

Figma Console: no known advisories, no build provenance. Shadcn UI: no known advisories, no build provenance. Every capability tashan measures is checked against the OSV advisory database at the version you would install today, for install-time scripts and for build provenance. The audit reads public evidence and never executes anything.

Question 3

How were these two compared?

Accepted Answer

Both were measured on the same day by the same scorer, from public signal only — npm download volume and publish cadence, repository activity, maintainer count and registry status. Nobody can pay to change a score, a rank or a listing.

	Figma Console	Shadcn UI	what it means
tashan score	85	73	upkeep + freshness, gated by adoption
Adoption evidence	21k/wk	3k/wk	the raw public signal the score came from
Last release	active	active	npm publish or repo push
Upkeep	99	83	cadence, maintainers, status
Expertise grade	not graded	solid	an LLM read of its own documentation against a fixed rubric
Security audit	no known advisories, no build provenance	no known advisories, no build provenance	existence of findings is always free; the detail a licence buys is on each dossier
Licence	MIT	MIT
Maintainers	more than one	more than one	bus-factor risk

Figma Console vs Shadcn UI

Install either