Workfile vs Samarth Gtm
Samarth Gtm scores 4 points higher — a narrow lead. Read the evidence rows below before treating it as decisive. Both are measured the same way, on the same day, from public evidence only — so this is a comparison of two measurements rather than two marketing pages. How we measure ›
| Workfile | Samarth Gtm | what it means | |
|---|---|---|---|
| tashan score | 70 | 74 | upkeep + freshness, gated by adoption |
| Adoption evidence | 3k/wk | 11k/wk | the raw public signal the score came from |
| Last release | active | active | npm publish or repo push |
| Upkeep | 69 | 72 | cadence, maintainers, status |
| Expertise grade | deep | deep | an LLM read of its own documentation against a fixed rubric |
| Security audit | no known advisories | no known advisories | a summary — the full audit, free, is on each dossier |
| Licence | MIT | — | |
| Maintainers | one primary | one primary | bus-factor risk |
Install either
Workfile
claude mcp add illodev-workfile -- npx -y @illodev/workfileSamarth Gtm
claude mcp add samarth-gtm -- npx -y samarth-gtm-mcpNeither score is a security verdict — "well maintained" and "nothing known is wrong" are different claims, which is why the audit is a separate row and never folded into the number. The full audit for each — the advisory ids, the version that fixes them and anything that runs at install time — is free on its own page: Workfile · Samarth Gtm.
Both numbers above are today’s. Whichever you pick, the question that matters next is when it changes — and this page cannot know that. Pro keeps the series behind each capability, and names what to move to.
- Every score since we started measuring, for any capability
- The named replacement when something you run is dying — not just that it is
tashan doctorover the config you already have, on your machine
Start a 7-day trial › Everything measured on this page stays free.