Claude Funnel vs Meegle
Meegle scores 5 points higher — a narrow lead. Read the evidence rows below before treating it as decisive. Both are measured the same way, on the same day, from public evidence only — so this is a comparison of two measurements rather than two marketing pages. How we measure ›
| Claude Funnel | Meegle | what it means | |
|---|---|---|---|
| tashan score | 75 | 80 | upkeep + freshness, gated by adoption |
| Adoption evidence | 3k/wk | 17k/wk | the raw public signal the score came from |
| Last release | active | active | npm publish or repo push |
| Upkeep | 97 | 98 | cadence, maintainers, status |
| Expertise grade | not graded | not graded | an LLM read of its own documentation against a fixed rubric |
| Security audit | no known advisories, no build provenance | no known advisories, no build provenance | a summary — the full audit, free, is on each dossier |
| Licence | MIT | MIT | |
| Maintainers | more than one | more than one | bus-factor risk |
Install either
Claude Funnel
claude mcp add interactive-inc-claude-funnel -- npx -y @interactive-inc/claude-funnelMeegle
claude mcp add lark-project-meegle -- npx -y @lark-project/meegleNeither score is a security verdict — "well maintained" and "nothing known is wrong" are different claims, which is why the audit is a separate row and never folded into the number. The full audit for each — the advisory ids, the version that fixes them and anything that runs at install time — is free on its own page: Claude Funnel · Meegle.
Both numbers above are today’s. Whichever you pick, the question that matters next is when it changes — and this page cannot know that. Pro keeps the series behind each capability, and names what to move to.
- Every score since we started measuring, for any capability
- The named replacement when something you run is dying — not just that it is
tashan doctorover the config you already have, on your machine
Start a 7-day trial › Everything measured on this page stays free.