Question 1

Is Korean Law or Context7 better?

Accepted Answer

Context7 scores 96.0 and Korean Law scores 72.0 on the tashan score, which measures upkeep and freshness gated by real adoption. Neither number is a security audit and neither can be bought. The gap is wide enough to be decisive.

Question 2

Are Korean Law and Context7 safe to install?

Accepted Answer

Korean Law: no known advisories, no build provenance. Context7: no known advisories, no build provenance. Every capability tashan measures is checked against the OSV advisory database at the version you would install today, for install-time scripts and for build provenance. The audit reads public evidence and never executes anything.

Question 3

How were these two compared?

Accepted Answer

Both were measured on the same day by the same scorer, from public signal only — npm download volume and publish cadence, repository activity, maintainer count and registry status. Nobody can pay to change a score, a rank or a listing.

	Korean Law	Context7	what it means
tashan score	72	96	upkeep + freshness, gated by adoption
Adoption evidence	4k/wk	619k/wk	the raw public signal the score came from
Last release	active	active	npm publish or repo push
Upkeep	72	98	cadence, maintainers, status
Expertise grade	deep	deep	an LLM read of its own documentation against a fixed rubric
Security audit	no known advisories, no build provenance	no known advisories, no build provenance	a summary — the full audit, free, is on each dossier
Licence	MIT	MIT
Maintainers	one primary	more than one	bus-factor risk

Korean Law vs Context7

Install either