The Index · Dev Tools & CI

Handler vs Fiori

These two are level on the tashan score (within 2 points), so the score does not decide it. The evidence rows below are where they differ. Both are measured the same way, on the same day, from public evidence only — so this is a comparison of two measurements rather than two marketing pages. How we measure ›

HandlerFioriwhat it means
tashan score8486upkeep + freshness, gated by adoption
Adoption evidence803k/wk108k/wkthe raw public signal the score came from
Last releaseactiveactivenpm publish or repo push
Upkeep9599cadence, maintainers, status
Expertise gradesolidnot gradedan LLM read of its own documentation against a fixed rubric
Security auditno known advisoriesno known advisoriesa summary — the full audit, free, is on each dossier
LicenceApache-2.0
Maintainersmore than onemore than onebus-factor risk

Install either

Handler

claude mcp add handler -- npx -y mcp-handler

Fiori

claude mcp add fiori-mcp-server -- npx -y @sap-ux/fiori-mcp-server

Neither score is a security verdict — "well maintained" and "nothing known is wrong" are different claims, which is why the audit is a separate row and never folded into the number. The full audit for each — the advisory ids, the version that fixes them and anything that runs at install time — is free on its own page: Handler · Fiori.

All ranked Dev Tools & CI ›

tashan Pro$6/mo

Both numbers above are today’s. Whichever you pick, the question that matters next is when it changes — and this page cannot know that. Pro keeps the series behind each capability, and names what to move to.

  • Every score since we started measuring, for any capability
  • The named replacement when something you run is dying — not just that it is
  • tashan doctor over the config you already have, on your machine

Start a 7-day trial › Everything measured on this page stays free.