Motiff vs Shadcn UI · ymadd
Shadcn UI · ymadd scores 7 points higher — a narrow lead. Read the evidence rows below before treating it as decisive. Both are measured the same way, on the same day, from public evidence only — so this is a comparison of two measurements rather than two marketing pages. How we measure ›
| Motiff | Shadcn UI · ymadd | what it means | |
|---|---|---|---|
| tashan score | 38 | 45 | upkeep + freshness, gated by adoption |
| Adoption evidence | 3k/wk | 2k/wk | the raw public signal the score came from |
| Last release | abandoned | stable | npm publish or repo push |
| Upkeep | 56 | 43 | cadence, maintainers, status |
| Expertise grade | not graded | not graded | an LLM read of its own documentation against a fixed rubric |
| Security audit | no known advisories, no build provenance | no known advisories, no build provenance | existence of findings is always free; the detail a licence buys is on each dossier |
| Licence | MIT License | MIT | |
| Maintainers | more than one | one primary | bus-factor risk |
Install either
Motiff
claude mcp add motiffcom-motiff-mcp-server -- npx -y @motiffcom/motiff-mcp-serverShadcn UI · ymadd
claude mcp add shadcn-ui-mcp-server -- npx -y shadcn-ui-mcp-serverNeither score is a security verdict — "well maintained" and "nothing known is wrong" are different claims, which is why the audit is a separate row and never folded into the number. The full audit for each, including what a licence adds, is on its own page: Motiff · Shadcn UI · ymadd.