Obsidian · StevenStavrakis vs Context7
Context7 scores 33 points higher on the same evidence, which is a real separation rather than noise. Both are measured the same way, on the same day, from public evidence only — so this is a comparison of two measurements rather than two marketing pages. How we measure ›
| Obsidian · StevenStavrakis | Context7 | what it means | |
|---|---|---|---|
| tashan score | 64 | 97 | upkeep + freshness, gated by adoption |
| Adoption evidence | 3k/wk | 1.1m/wk | the raw public signal the score came from |
| Last release | stable | active | npm publish or repo push |
| Upkeep | 74 | 99 | cadence, maintainers, status |
| Expertise grade | thin | not graded | an LLM read of its own documentation against a fixed rubric |
| Security audit | no known advisories, no build provenance | no known advisories, no build provenance | a summary — the full audit, free, is on each dossier |
| Licence | MIT | MIT | |
| Maintainers | more than one | more than one | bus-factor risk |
Install either
Obsidian · StevenStavrakis
claude mcp add obsidian -- npx -y obsidian-mcpContext7
claude mcp add upstash-context7 -- npx -y @upstash/context7-mcpNeither score is a security verdict — "well maintained" and "nothing known is wrong" are different claims, which is why the audit is a separate row and never folded into the number. The full audit for each — the advisory ids, the version that fixes them and anything that runs at install time — is free on its own page: Obsidian · StevenStavrakis · Context7.